Gruesome Video Shows Syrian Rebel Beheading Civilian

How much longer can the Obama administration hide its support for violent jihadists?

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
March 21, 2013

A gruesome YouTube video shows a member of the US-backed Free Syrian Army beheading a civilian in yet another example of how the west is supporting an uprising led by violent jihadist extremists.

WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC VIDEO. VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED. We expect this video to be removed from YouTube shortly.

The clip, which should not be watched by those of a nervous disposition, shows a masked man hacking away at a prisoner’s head with a machete before holding the severed head up in the air as those around him shout in celebration.

This is by no means the first time FSA militants have been caught on camera beheading civilians. Back in December we featured a video showing Syrian rebels forcing a child to behead a bound prisoner.

Later that same month, the Australian reported how rebels beheaded a young Christian man by the name of Andrei Arbashe because he complained about how the rebels were acting like bandits. After cutting him up into pieces, FSA fighters fed Arbashe to the dogs. The report noted that the incident underscored how, “rebels are committing atrocities against innocent civilians.”

Another video which emerged last month shows Syrian rebels chanting “Allahu Akbar” before cutting off the head of a civilian and dumping him in a hole in the ground.

These same insurgents have openly espoused their hatred for America as they ransack Christian churches, burn US flags, chant anti-Amican sloganser and sing the praises of Osama Bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11 attacks.

Multiple reports now confirm that the individuals responsible for these beheadings, many of them part of the Al-Qaeda group Jabhat al-Nusra which killed US troops in Iraq, are leading western-backed rebel forces in Syria. After the organization was declared a terrorist group by the US State Department, 29 different US-backed Syrian opposition groups pledged their allegiance to al-Nusra.

Given the series of bloodthirsty acts of terror committed by Syrian rebels, it’s little surprise that the evidence clearly suggests this week’s chemical weapons attack in Aleppo was launched by FSA militants.

The Obama administration’s transparently disingenuous attempt to initially deny the attack even took place and then spin a yearn that it was likely to have been carried out by the Syrian Army (when 16 of the victims were Syrian soldiers according to the impartial Syrian Observatory for Human Rights), again emphasizes how a fake narrative is being manufactured in an effort to hide the fact that western powers – just as they did in Libya – are supporting and empowering terrorists who have brazenly stated their goal to be the imposition of arcane Sharia law across the region.

The Obama administration has now sent almost half a billion dollars to Syrian rebels (many of whom aren’t even Syrian) – $500 million dollars to militants who have publicly embraced the group responsible for the kind of gruesome beheadings depicted in the video above.

Given the fact that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was carried out by some of the very same terrorists the administration armed in the overthrow of Colonel Gaddafi, for how much longer can Obama hide the fact that the US is once again throwing its weight behind bloodthirsty jihadists who hate the United States, hate the ideals of justice and freedom, and are who willing to commit the most savage acts of barbarity in pursuit of their extremist doctrine?

*********************

DOCUMENTS AND LINKS &;THE ROAD TO FREEDOM The plot against the Internet WE ARE ALL SLAVES

The plot against the Internet

Dubai is pictured. | AP Photo

00000000000000


target=”_blank”>CPT12 Presents.

Internet censorship is at stake in Dubai next week. | AP Photo

By ELIZA KRIGMAN | 12/1/12 3:15 PM EST

Bureaucrats from around the world will gather behind closed doors in Dubai next week to plot an end to the Internet as we know it — or so Washington would have you believe.

Hill lawmakers warn that the 120-plus U.S. delegation needs to fend off efforts by China, Russia and developing nations to use a United Nations branch organization to censor or tax the Net. Google is orchestrating an online petition drive, and even Grover Norquist is involved.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/the-plot-against-the-internet-84468.html#ixzz2DvgtAEzz

(Also on POLITICO: Tech less generous to Hill newbies than telecoms)

The hype is a perfect storm for Matt Drudge: The U.N. will take over the Internet — unless you act fast.

“It was very important for the United States to send a shot across the bow and let countries like China and Russia know that we are onto the games they’re trying to play,” said Rep. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.), who led a successful effort to pass a resolution against the interference in August. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) backed a companion measure in the Senate.

(Also on POLITICO: House Dems hit Verizon’s net neutrality stand)

What’s more likely — almost certain to happen, really — is that the World Conference on International Telecommunications will fail to change much of anything about the way the Web works or who cashes in during the two weeks of meetings that start Monday in this Middle Eastern enclave.

But paranoia runs deep in D.C. — almost as deep as the pockets of the tech companies and front groups that don’t want to take any chance that the U.S. government would endorse a treaty that would scramble their business models.

(Also on POLITICO: Senate committee approves email privacy bill)

Bruce Mehlman, a tech lobbyist whose clients include Red Hat, said “vigilance against such incursions” of government regulation “will be the eternal price of liberty.”

Google’s petition drive asks supporters to sign this statement: “A free and open world depends on a free and open Internet. Governments alone, working behind closed doors, should not direct its future. The billions of people around the globe who use the Internet should have a voice.”

(Also on POLITICO: FTC maverick a mystery on Google)

Even Norquist is in on the act. The Digital Liberty division of his Americans for Tax Reform machine warns that China, Russia and Brazil will stop at nothing in their efforts to clamp down on the Internet.

But as it turns out, the Internet is not about to be dismantled.

(Also on POLITICO: Grover Norquist’s not over)

In a consensus-driven process, member states of the International Telecommunications Union, a branch of the U.N., will negotiate a new treaty on international telecommunication regulations. It’s only one vote per country, and, by definition, that will weed out extreme proposals, experts say.

At the end of the day, the U.S. doesn’t have to sign the treaty — it’s all voluntary.

So why all the hysteria about the Dubai confab?

“The concern over WCIT was never that it would be the killing blow but rather the latest, and by no means the last, effort by repressive governments to kill the Internet any way they can,” said Larry Downes, a tech consultant and one of the preeminent rabble-rousers of doom surrounding the treaty negotiations.

(Also on POLITICO: The 2016 campaign: A tech forecast)

As Danielle Coffey, a government affairs executive at the Telecommunications Industry Association put it: “You can kill a document, but you can’t kill an idea.”

Web and telecom companies and public officials have serious concerns about the political and economic motives of other countries when it comes to the Internet. The Dubai conference presents an opportunity for states to get buy-in to principals that could legitimize censorship, to regulate global Web commerce to boost their bottom line, or to do both.

////////////////

http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/bl.jpg

//////////////

///////////////////////////////////////////////////