X-band RADAR blimps over Washington DC — Tracks Aircraft, Cars, and Boats

1Untitled88

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, Maryland – After a protracted development program, The U.S. Army is planning to finally deploy by year’s end the first of its new airships designed to aid in air and missile threat detection for the Northeastern U.S.

The deployment is highlighting what some in the nation’s defense establishment say is a vulnerability in U.S. homeland protection: the ability to detect a cruise missile targeting a U.S. city. Cruise missiles are some of the most complex targets as they often fly very low – possibly below radar detection, operate at slow speeds and feature low radar cross sections. Their proliferation worries some defense planners, who fear a cruise missile could be launched from a ship or aircraft off the U.S. coast, giving commanders little time to react.

The history of the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System (Jlens) is as complicated as its name is long. The program began in the late 1990s, and Raytheon won the contract to develop the system in 1998. The program has cost $2.8 billion, a number that has raised the eyebrows of some in the national security community. The Pentagon originally envisioned fielding multiple systems, but has only built one thus far for operations.

After multiple testing periods, the Joint Chiefs of Staff finally approved a three-year evaluation, which will include a unique blend of actual operations, testing and tactics formulation. The evaluation begins next year and runs through fiscal 2017.

Each Jlens “orbit,” or system, consists of two tethered aerostats – one carries a 360-deg., VHF surveillance radar and the other carries an X-band fire control radar; both sensors are manufactured by Raytheon. Each aerostat is 243-ft. long and filled with a helium-air mix similar to the pressure of air outside the structure; this design allows for the system to stay aloft for extended periods even if punctured.

The first of two aerostats, the one carrying the VHF radar, is set to deploy within days depending on final checkout and weather. The second will follow in early spring, says Army Capt. Matt Villa, the Jlens plans and coordination officer at Aberdeen. They will be moored at the Graces Quarters facility at Aberdeen and float at about 10,000 ft. The plan is to operate the aerostats continuously, only shutting them down when maintenance is necessary or weather intervenes. They are built to withstand 100 kt. winds.

From this high altitude, the aerostats will monitor airborne traffic in an area about the size of Texas, stretching from northern New York state to southern North Carolina. They will provide a unique vantage for the North American Aerospace Defense Command (Norad) and for homeland defense. Existing air and missile defense radars in the U.S. are ground-based, limiting their field of view behind obstructions, such as mountains, hills and tall buildings. Jlens, by contrast, will be able to monitor activities in canyons, says Army Maj. Gen. Glenn Bramhall, commander of the 263rd Army Air and Missile Defense Command.

This is especially critical to guard against cruise missiles, a threat that is growing, he says.

“If you look at the terrain – the avenues in – to important cities such as [Washington] D.C., we have our systems now elevated on platforms but don’t have the ability to look down into the Potomac area,” Bramhall said, noting existing detection capabilities are limited. “We need something that flies much higher … And early detection, too, will give command more time to negate the system coming in.”

The higher altitude could give commanders a few more precious minutes to mobilize defenses if needed. The most probable intercept method would be the use of a fighter deploying an air-to-air missile, though ground-based systems could be used if they are on alert and positioned in the right locations. Fighter intercepts, however, rely on aircraft flying combat air patrols within range of the target.

“We have the ability to defeat the cruise missile, but it is the whole detection [aspect that is needed],” Bramhall said. “If I can detect this thing much farther out, it gives command time to get the air assets in place [and] if I can give command four more minutes or five more minutes, that is a lot of time.”

Bramhall stressed that the Jlens aerostats do not record data and do not carry cameras or signals/communications intelligence sensors. Privacy advocates have raised concerns that the platforms could be used to spy on U.S. citizens, but he says the systems are not technically capable of doing so.

In practice, the Jlens data will be fed to Norad, which is able to quickly correlate it with information from the FAA. This three-year trial is unique because the radar data from Jlens will actually be included in operations, not sidelined merely as test data, according to USAF Col. Chuck Douglass, chief of Norad’s command and control systems division. Earlier trials were used for risk reduction, proved the system worked and verified the data was sound, providing confidence to Norad that it could rely on it for operational use, he said.

During the operational period, testers will gradually introduce more and more difficult scenarios into the system. The most complex will be to detect and target multiple threats coming from different directions at the same time, Douglass said. He declined to identify how many threats can be targeted at once.

The Army will provide a report to Congress in May with more details about the scenarios to come in the exercise, he said.


Phased Array RADAR on board, operating anywhere between 50-100GHz , targeted anywhere that the array is pointing from the sky to the ground below.

http://aviationweek.com/defense/jlens…

In the Raytheon promotional video for the JLENS RADAR system, they show the REAL uses for the system are for tracking Planes, boats, cars, and other objects the size of a car (down to even groups of people).

http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/…

The media talking about “detecting cruise missiles” as the reason for deployment in the Northeast US. Is there a cruise missile threat in the Northeast USA? From who? Russia? China? UK? France? Who exactly has these cruise missiles which we need to be on guard for?

Real guess as to WHY they need two mobile airborne X-band RADARs over the area, is for tracking the population in case of civil unrest. Not for “protecting” the East coast from some amorphous non-existent incoming cruise missile threat.

The promo from Raytheon touts the TRACKING OF CARS AT A NASCAR RACE.

Military documents talk of GROUND TRACKING of moving objects as one of the other main uses for these devices.

http://www.msl.army.mil/Documents/Bri…

This means they can track all cars using military airborne RADAR over a domestic area. Plain and simple, these blimps are for tracking the population, not really for “cruise missiles”.. although the system can indeed detect a cruise missile, as well as every other moving object below of any size above a human being.

This RADAR is pointing DOWN towards the ground, thus there won’t be any “hiding” behind objects in the way. Like a floating satellite, only much closer to the ground, and capable of being moved at a moments notice.